Natural born citizen -
https://www.facebook.com/notes/united-states-minutemen/natural-born-citizen-references-notes-and-links/867213850061184
References - internet links to documents for determining types of citizenship
http://www.constitution.org/vattel/vattel_01.htm
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?438946-Natural-Born-Citizen-Defined
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The opinion (written by Chief Justice Morrison Waite) first asked whether Minor
was a citizen of the United States, and answered that she was, citing both the
Fourteenth Amendment and earlier common law. Exploring the common-law origins of
citizenship, the court observed that "new citizens may be born or they may be
created by naturalization" and that the Constitution "does not, in words, say
who shall be natural-born citizens." Under the common law, according to the
court, "it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who
were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were
natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or
foreigners."[12] The court observed that some authorities "include as citizens
children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of
their parents"—but since Minor was born in the United States and her parents
were U.S. citizens, she was unquestionably a citizen herself, even under the
narrowest possible definition, and the court thus noted that the subject did not
need to be explored in any greater depth.[13] #defeatisil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Federalist Papers http://thomas.loc.gov/home/histdox/fedpapers.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1795
( The United States Naturalization Act of January 29, 1795 (1 Stat. 414)
repealed and replaced the Naturalization Act of 1790. The 1795 Act differed from
the 1790 Act by increasing the period of required residence from two to five
years in the United States, by introducing the Declaration of Intention
requirement, or "first papers", which created a two-step naturalization process,
and by conferring the status of citizen and not natural born citizen. The Act
specified that naturalized citizenship was reserved only for "free white
person[s]." It also changed the requirement in the 1790 Act of "good character"
to read "good moral character." )
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/401/815/case.html
http://www.uscis.gov/us-citizenship/citizenship-through-parents
N-600, Application for Certificate of Citizenship
http://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/files/form/n-600.pdf
http://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/files/form/n-600instr.pdf
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
http://www.scribd.com/doc/185258103/Three-Legged-Stool-Test-for-Natural-Born-Citizen-to-Constitutional-Standards
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/05/senator-cruz-senator-rubio-and-governor.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
collections of articles
https://www.facebook.com/rfgamble/posts/10153725398477398?comment_id=10153725490867398&ref=notif¬if_t=feed_comment
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Ted_Cruz
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/11/25/alan-grayson-threatens-lawsuit-on-citizenship-grounds-if-ted-cruz-is-the-gop-nominee/
http://www.birtherreport.com/2015/04/treason-citizens-for-constitution-obama.html#iR1lr8XSjt5pD8I1.99
Senator Cruz, you can count on me, and a million other Americans, to support and
defend our Constitution, to include Article II, Section 1!
You know that Obama is not a natural born citizen and yet you were never willing
to do or say anything about it. And you know that you are not one either, and
yet you push us aside and feign ignorance of the real meaning of the term. As JB
Williams writes:
The answer is found in the Founders statements identifying the source of the
term, Vattel’s international treatise on Natural Law, The Law of Nations, book 1
– Chapter XIX. Every American can easily find it, read it, understand it and
know it. There is nothing at all ambiguous about it… unless you let your
political agenda drive your facts.
The true definition of the natural born Citizen requirement for the Oval Office
as described throughout the entirety of Chapter XIX can be summed up in this
section from 212…
“As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the
children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their
fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire
this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is
presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society,
reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the
fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely
by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years
of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society
in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is
necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born
there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his
country.”
Barack Obama’s Father was never a U.S. Citizen. And your father, Senator Cruz,
was never a U.S. citizen either, until he naturalized 35 years after your birth.
You remained a legal citizen of Canada until you renounced your Canadian
citizenship on May 14, 2014.
Also this: In a 2012 interview you said this:
Interviewer: “What is your understanding of how one becomes a natural born
Citizen?”
Cruz: “Two citizen parents and born on the soil.”
Interviewer: “Not exactly, but as I don't have enough time to fully explain how
one does become an natural born Citizen, based on your understanding, would you
agree that Barack Obama is ineligible to be POTUS?”
Cruz: “I would agree.”
This would confirm that you know, without any reasonable doubt, that neither
you, nor Obama, are natural born (US) citizens. It would also confirm that you
are knowingly conspiring to commit treason, since usurpation of the Office of
POTUS by fraud, deception, dissembling, and deceit is equivalent to an act of
war against our sovereign Nation and States.
This would also make you either a natural born (Cuban) citizen, or an
‘anchor-baby’ Canadian citizen, or, since you have formally renounced your
Canadian citizenship, a man without a country … until you apply for formal
naturalization as a U.S. citizen (if you have, please show us) – too late to
become a natural born (US) citizen, since this is a condition achieved only at
the moment of birth!
I will conclude with this statement that I make to every lying political hack
who asks for my support but refuses to support the Constitution and call for
Obama’s impeachment … yesterday!
TREASON!
It is an act of TREASON for an unknown entity and admitted non-natural born
Citizen of the U.S. to usurp the Office of President of the United States using
proven-to-be forged ID’s (Certificate of Birth & Selective Service Registration)
and a self-published SS# 042-68-4425 that fails the government’s own E-Verify
and SS# Verification systems for employment in the United States.
Paying homage to and legitimization of that unknown and undocumented entity who
uses forged and stolen identification documents, by calling him ‘The President’,
is to be knowingly complicit in that act of TREASON!
Therefore anyone who calls that undocumented entity ‘President’ becomes him or
herself a Treasonous Co-Conspirator!
(www.TinyURL.com/TreasonousCo-Conspirators).
So the real question now, Senator Cruz, is can We The People count on you to do
the right thing and withdraw you candidacy and expose the imposter in the Oval
Office?
In Liberty and In Truth.
Neil B. Turner
Citizens for the Constitution
NBTurner@RoadRunner.com
Read more at
http://www.birtherreport.com/2015/04/treason-citizens-for-constitution-obama.html#eq5jCPhhDwzmb524.99
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
He may have if he was a real natural born citizen of the United States.. BUT he
is not. Neither is Obama, Rubio or Jindal. Pelosi and her progressive communist
democrats pulled a lying scam on people and so far, the traitors to our country
have gotten by with it because SHEEPLE are not taught GOVERNMENT anymore. There
are differences in TYPES OF CITIZENS and Cruz, Obama, Rubio and Jindal are a
SUB-TYPE of NATURALIZED CITIZENS created by LAWS. Natural born citizens do not
need any laws, they are born IN THEIR COUNTRY TO A PAIR OF CITIZEN PARENTS.
Their mother and father are both US Citizens BEFORE THEY ARE BORN. A naturalized
citizen can have a single US parent and can be born in another country but THEY
CAN NEVER BE NATURAL BORN CITIZENS BY DEFINITION.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/88/162
The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens.
Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the
nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was
never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its
citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives,
or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1898, Supreme Court Justice Gray in delivering the majority opinion in the
case of US v Wong Kim Ark stated “A person born out of the jurisdiction of the
United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized, ... by authority
of Congress, exercised ... by declaring certain classes of persons to be
citizens, as in the enactments conferring citizenship upon foreign-born children
of citizens ...” [See: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/169/649]
That statement clearly indicates that children of citizens who are born outside
US Territory, who gain their citizenship by Congressional statute are
naturalized. In other words, simply having citizen parents isn’t enough to make
a natural born citizen!
In 1951, Chief Judge Phillips in delivering the opinion in the case of Zimmer v.
Acheson for the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit said of
someone who was born outside the United States to two US citizen parents,
acquiring their citizenship under Revised Statutes § 1993 (the precursor of
todays 8 USC 1401), that the nature of their citizenship “status as a citizen
was that of a naturalized citizen and not a native-born citizen.” [See:
https://www.courtlistener.com/.../zimmer-v-acheson.../...]
In 1956, Judge Hamley, in delivering the opinion in the case of Wong Kam Wo v.
Dulles for the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, in a case
pertaining to two men born outside the United States to a naturalized US citizen
father, noted that Revised Statutes § 1993 (the precursor of todays 8 USC 1401)
is “a naturalization law in the constitutional sense.” [See:
https://www.courtlistener.com/.../wong-kam-wo-and.../...]
And in 1971, Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, who just 4 years earlier had
written the majority opinion in the case of Afroyim v. Rusk, had the following
observation to make of foreign-born children of US citizens; “Although those
Americans who acquire their citizenship under statutes conferring citizenship on
the foreign-born children of citizens are not popularly thought of as
naturalized citizens, the use of the word "naturalize" in this way has a
considerable constitutional history. Congress is empowered by the Constitution
to "establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization," Art. I, 8. Anyone acquiring
citizenship solely under the exercise of this power is, constitutionally
speaking, a naturalized citizen.”
It appears that the position of the courts for well over a century is that
foreign born children of US citizens who acquire their citizenship wholly
through Congressional statutes are “naturalized” citizens.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------